In the 1920s, a textiles expert developed a code for transmitting information about clothing by telegram. He even received a patent for this invention.

The National Cryptologic Museum in Fort Meade near Washington, DC, owns hundreds of codebooks. Here is an especially interesting one:


As can be seen, this codebook depicts fashion pictures. It reminded me of the hidden messages in fashion pictures that are mentioned in a WW2 censorship broshure I have mentioned on this blog several times:


Was this codebook the answer to the still unsolved question how the steganographic code used in these fashion drawings works? Was this codebook used by spies to camouflage their spy reports as fashion drawings?

The answer is no. The codebook displayed in the museum (Fairchild’s Illustrated Women’s Wear Code from 1921) had nothing to do with steganography or espionage. Instead, it was meant to encode all kinds of clothing types in five letter groups that could be easily sent by telegram. For instance, the following excerpt shows different types of blouses, along with their code representations:


If a retail store wanted to order, say, 20 red bib blouses, it simply sent the message “20 RED UHZUV” to the supplier. As telegrams were usually charged by the number of words, it is clear that such a code saved money. Of course, the encoding was also a kind of encryption, as the meaning of expressions like UJAGE or UHZER was not known to everybody. If a high degree of security was desired, an additional encryption could be applied (e.g., by interpreting the letters as a number and by adding a key number to it).

Check here for a larger scan of a page from this codebook.


Apparently, the creator of this codebook (a certain Louis Harmuth, who also wrote the Dictionary of Textiles) wanted to prevent his competitors from copying this concept. This is proven by the following entry in the Catalog of Copyright Entries:


Louis Harmuth also filed a patent for an “Illustrated Code”.


Here is an illustration from his patent:


Interestingly, the codebook only refers to women’s wear, while the patent doesn’t say anything about gender. On the other hand, all the illustrations in the patent depict women’s wear only. The reason probably is that Louis Harmuth was specialized on women’s wear. He even was the editor of a magazine named Women’s Wear, as can be read in the dictionary he wrote.

Harmuth’s textile codebook is an interesting document from a time when telegraphy was an important means of business communication and when encoding information such that it could be transmitted by telegram was an important issue. With the advent of fax, email and other communication technology codes like these became obsolete.

Further reading: A reverse-engineered codebook from World War I


Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Kommentare (1)

  1. #1 schorsch
    21. August 2018

    Zu Beginn des ersten Weltkriegs wurden in Deutschland etliche Offiziere, Adlige und andere Automobilisten versehentlich erschossen, einfach nur, weil sie Auto gefahren sind, während doch jeder wusste, dass automobile russische und französische Spione in Deutschland aktiv waren.

    In Frankreich und England wurden Inhaber von Nestlé-Läden gelyncht – einfach nur, weil Nestlé nicht englisch oder französisch war.

    Leute sind bespuckt, verkrüppelt und gelyncht worden, weil sie in Paris oder London deutsch, in Berlin französich oder englisch gesprochen haben.

    In einer solch hysterischen Situation einen Rollkragenpullover zu tragen, wo sonst keiner einen Rollkragen trägt, einen Hut mit blauer Schleife, die den deutschen U-Booten den Weg zur nächsten Werft zeigt, ein modisches Fischbeinkorsett, welches nur notdürftig seinen eigentlichen Zweck verbirgt, den Deutschen die Position der britschen Schlachtflotte zu offenbaren – nicht gut

    In Kriegen wird jeder gelyncht, der auch nur um einen Polka-Dot auf dem gefleckten Kleid vom Nachbarn abweicht. Insofern ist so ein Illustrated Code eine gute Idee -schafft Hysterie beim Gegner und lässt ihn sein eigenes militärisches Potential reduzieren – zumindest soweit dieses lustige Röcke trägt.